Showing posts with label internet censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet censorship. Show all posts

Monday, January 23, 2012

CIA Leaked bin Laden Operation Details to (SOPA-Supporting) Sony

Hollywood's pockets (actually) more important than national security, 
or
CIA needed Hollywood to help sell their ridiculous Bin Laden death story,

By the way, did you know what Hollywood means? Holly wood was used by the druids to make their magic wands. The Government and Hollywood, creating our fake reality......

Article Shared from: Russia Today

While the White House went to great lengths to keep the details of last year’s raid on the Osama bin Laden compound from penetrating the public peripheral, investigators are questioning how much intel the Pentagon passed to hotshots in Hollywood.

Lawmakers say that the May 2011 event that nearly ended the War on Terror was among the most secretive in the history of the CIA, and the Obama administration has since shunned the public from any details pertaining to the plan even after the former al-Qaeda leader’s execution and burial at sea. As skeptics scorned President Obama for his lack of transparency in the process and demanded proof, the White House largely left details of the event and what occurred before and after locked up in Washington.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

PC Magazine: Are Hacker Attacks Government Operation To Push Internet Censorship Laws?

Link to PC Mag ARTICLE 

Comments From: The Alexander Higgins BLOG:

Written by: Alexander Higgins - July 6, 2011 at 4:20 pm

An article in PC magazine shows that the corporate media is starting to ask the same question that the alternative media has been asking. Are the recent string of hacker attacks a false flag operations meant to drum up support to push through Internet censorship laws that the public would otherwise protest?

Are the recent string of hacker attacks a government sponsored operation meant to rouse public support for internet censorship bills in Congress that public would normally protest against?

Just think about some of the bills congress is trying to push through in the name of anti-piracy and cyber security.
The ProtectIP act would allow the government, even on behalf of requests of corporations to seize websites without the due process of law, entirely sidestepping the constitution and even allow complete censorship of search engines and the media.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Obama Skeptics beware, the white house is out to seek and destroy

Photo: Wikimedia Commons
The white house has hired an attack dog blogger to confront / quash  online postings about Obama that they deem untrue.

We already know the government and military hire people and use software to post comments in their support online. ("U.S. Gov‘t Software Creates ’Fake People’ to Spread Message via Social Networking", "Military report: Secretly recruit or hire bloggers"). Doesn't that seem like lying and propaganda? False support in hopes to sway peoples decisions?

I wonder how they will quash certain truths, like the fact that Obama has us engaged in an ILLEGAL war with Libya. And what makes them think people will listen to this new white house shill blogger anyway?

Two immediate assumptions come to mind, they will focus on the tea party and namely "birthers". What what form will their defense come in? Blog posts directed at specific writings rumors or allegations? Comments posted to the sites themselves? Removal of these posts by the government because they deem them untrue? How many times does the government have to lie to us before people will realize, they cannot be trusted? :)

From Prison Planet:
 Lee’s first Tweet as an official mouthpiece for White House propaganda and the Obama administration’s move to launch an “aggressive defense of the president and his policies” gives us some indication of what we can expect – the post includes a picture of the Terminator robot.
“If you’re going to post something online about Obama that isn’t true, Lee is going to be the one to handle you,” reports Chris O’Shea, noting that the move is about “squashing any negative stories” that could derail Obama’s re-election bid.

 Read the complete article HERE