Written By: Madison Ruppert, Contributing Writer Activist Post8/2/11
It is hard to deny the fact that the so-called “truth movement” has been gaining steam over the years. Now, we could argue all day long about what exactly the truth movement is, but for the sake of clarity I define it as the movement away from blind trust and belief in government and the mainstream media.
Under this definition, it would mean every single person questioning the official story of September 11th, 2001, or any other terrorist attack, anyone who sees the movement towards centralized world government, and the hypocritical coverage of war and human rights atrocities. This also includes those around the globe who question the provenance and goals of groups like al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, the ADL and any other organization for that matter. Under my working definition, those who see that we Americans currently live in an autocratic oligarchical police state, those who question the Western hegemony and imperialistic crusades in the Middle East, and so forth.
It's common when someone changes their position on something that people will line up to tout the fact that “they saw it coming”.
Website the "Federal Jack" reported today that Charlie Veitch, co founder of the Love Police (Anti Terror Squad) a high profile activist movement in London changed his position on 9/11, saying he now believes the official story.
Why? It's not so clear yet, Veitch describes having heard both sides and now simply believing the government got caught with its pants down in this VIDEO.
But having been involved in the 9/11 truth movement for 5 years myself, I can say that I have never heard of someone switching back to believing the official story once they are confronted with the mounds of evidence that point to the fact that the government is lying about what happened on that tragic day.
Now, I did NOT see this coming but I do think there may have been some clues that could have tipped us off to the fact that there might be something fishy about Mr. Veitch, and perhaps we can use these clues to help us be wearier of those figurehead celebrity activist types whose high profile roles can help make or break a movement. After all its not about one person,we are a collective.
Here’s just a short list of some possible warning signs:
I always thought Danny’s departure from the group was weird. He was the founder (right?) and seemed to be better spoken, more concise and wittier than Charlie.
Charlie’s violent anarchist rant video(s) could have been a ploy to discredit the movement in the elites favorite way – have everyone thinking the movement is full of violent people ready to strike. After all we have seen an upswing in “anarchists” showing up at major protests across the globe, whose only purpose seems to be to discredit the people protesting. There are many instances of agent provocateurs posing as protestors or anarchists.
His father is a rich oil exec – guilty by association? Maybe not so fair but worth looking into.
He had two very high profile arrests, one at the G20 summit in Canada, and the other at the recent royal wedding in Britain. How did he get so much exposure? Was this to be used to insight revolt among his followers?
It’s disheartening that this has happened, but Charlie Veitch is not THE movement, he is one man, and all of the true hearted followers the Love Police had before (hopefully) still remain committed to truth and love.
We lost someone on our side, but EVERYTHING'S OK, for a truth has been exposed. Thank you Charlie Veitch for showing your true colors.
