As the details about the CO shooter come out, the story gets curiouser and curiouser. The nice thing is, more people are asking questions rather than swallowing what they are supposed to believe as dictated by the lamestream media.
Today, some blogs and various sites are reporting (because few media outlets will) that James Holmes' father was the lead scientist at FICO the American credit score company, and was/ is about to testify as a whistle blower on the Libor banking scandal. Many questions are being asked about the shooting that deserve abetter explanation. Here's a link to an article written by Mike Adams of Natural News that asks many important questions:
It's been over 50 years, but Wayne Ritchie says he can still remember how it felt to be dosed with acid.
He was drinking bourbon and soda with other federal officers at a holiday party in 1957 at the U.S. Post Office
Building on Seventh and Mission streets. They were cracking jokes and
swapping stories when, suddenly, the room began to spin. The red and
green lights on the Christmas tree in the corner spiraled wildly.
Ritchie's body temperature rose. His gaze fixed on the dizzying colors
around him.
It's common when someone changes their position on something that people will line up to tout the fact that “they saw it coming”.
Website the "Federal Jack" reported today that Charlie Veitch, co founder of the Love Police (Anti Terror Squad) a high profile activist movement in London changed his position on 9/11, saying he now believes the official story.
Why? It's not so clear yet, Veitch describes having heard both sides and now simply believing the government got caught with its pants down in this VIDEO.
But having been involved in the 9/11 truth movement for 5 years myself, I can say that I have never heard of someone switching back to believing the official story once they are confronted with the mounds of evidence that point to the fact that the government is lying about what happened on that tragic day.
Now, I did NOT see this coming but I do think there may have been some clues that could have tipped us off to the fact that there might be something fishy about Mr. Veitch, and perhaps we can use these clues to help us be wearier of those figurehead celebrity activist types whose high profile roles can help make or break a movement. After all its not about one person,we are a collective.
Here’s just a short list of some possible warning signs:
I always thought Danny’s departure from the group was weird. He was the founder (right?) and seemed to be better spoken, more concise and wittier than Charlie.
Charlie’s violent anarchist rant video(s) could have been a ploy to discredit the movement in the elites favorite way – have everyone thinking the movement is full of violent people ready to strike. After all we have seen an upswing in “anarchists” showing up at major protests across the globe, whose only purpose seems to be to discredit the people protesting. There are many instances of agent provocateurs posing as protestors or anarchists.
His father is a rich oil exec – guilty by association? Maybe not so fair but worth looking into.
He had two very high profile arrests, one at the G20 summit in Canada, and the other at the recent royal wedding in Britain. How did he get so much exposure? Was this to be used to insight revolt among his followers?
It’s disheartening that this has happened, but Charlie Veitch is not THE movement, he is one man, and all of the true hearted followers the Love Police had before (hopefully) still remain committed to truth and love.
We lost someone on our side, but EVERYTHING'S OK, for a truth has been exposed. Thank you Charlie Veitch for showing your true colors.
